4.6 TMS-05 HGV Overtaking Ban

4.6.1 ITS service at a glance

ITS service definition

An HGV Overtaking ban service means to channel the heavy goods vehicles onto a single lane (slow lane). 

The heavy goods vehicles overtaking ban implementation is one of the traffic management measures allowing traffic managers and road operators to propose solutions for a better fluidity of their network during peak periods. This traffic control measure constitutes one of the priority services to improve the cohabitation of heavy goods vehicles and private cars on networks with high levels of traffic.

ITS service objectives

Objectives:

  • Monitor and manage the HGV traffic flow on the motorway network
  • Reduce journey times for light vehicles 
  • Improve safety by reducing the number of lane changes and vehicle queues caused by slow lorries overtaking
  • Ensure a better acceptance of heavy goods vehicles by the other road users.

The service allows traffic managers and road operators to support better fluidity on the network during peak periods.

ITS service radar

ITS service key words

  • HGV, Overtaking Ban

4.6.2 ITS service profile

4.6.2.1 General ITS service description

During peak or congested periods on the main carriageway, HGV Overtaking may cause vehicles to brake or change lanes, creating higher occupancy and lower headways. This causes drivers to reduce their speed. 

This speed reduction often causes following vehicles to brake, resulting in a propagation wave of slowing vehicles that travels back along the line of traffic on the main carriageway upstream where the HGV overtakes.

Traffic congestion on the network due to HGV overtaking with a low speed differential results in traffic slowdown in the middle and/or left lanes. The major impact is a decreased capacity of the network. 

Additionally, during peak periods when congestion is increased there may also be a higher risk of accidents.

The HGV overtaking ban service is implemented through the deployment of ban signals on the main carriageway. This service intends to organize flow of heavy goods vehicles on the motorway network by channelling them onto a single lane (slow lane) in order to improve the traffic flow conditions.

4.6.2.2 What is the vision?

Public opinion considers that heavy goods vehicles are dangerous and disturb the traffic when overtaking. This requires research for means to improve journey times and safety by reducing vehicle queues caused by slow lorries overtaking while ensuring a better acceptance of heavy goods vehicles by other road users.

Heavy goods vehicles overtaking ban implementation on long distances (several kilometres) is a traffic management measure enabling traffic managers and road operators to propose solutions for better fluidity of their network during peak periods. This measure constitutes one of the priority services to improve cohabitation between heavy goods vehicles and private car drivers on high traffic networks.

The overtaking ban is implemented during periods where the network capacity reaches its saturation point or when trucks are too numerous. According to the context and objectives, the deployment of overtaking ban can be managed in static way (the overtaking can be permanent or intermittent) or in dynamic way.

Recommendations and requirements presented in chapter “Harmonization requirements and advice” of this ITS service description mainly concern the dynamic overtaking ban service.

The deployed HGV overtaking ban intends to:

  • Monitor and manage the HGV traffic flow onto the motorway network,
  • Shorten journey duration and increase safety for personal vehicles by reducing queues caused by slow lorries overtaking,
  • Reduce CO2 emission
  • Ensure a better acceptance of heavy goods vehicles by other road users.

An HGV overtaking ban can be deployed on 2 and 3 lane (or more) highways. Nevertheless, due to national regulations, such a service is only allowed on 2 lane highways in some countries (Netherlands for example).

The deployment of an HGV overtaking ban is generally assessed against the following parameters:

  • network typology (number of entrances and exits, slopes, etc.),
  • percentage of HGVs,
  • number of HGVs,
  • traffic flow,
  • period (in some countries no ban is issued during the weekend).

4.6.2.3 What is the mission?

Take into account national regulations to implement the ban:

  • Different political situations and objectives among actors to implement the ban

Define the strategy for implantation of the ban according various parameters:

  • network typology (number of entrances and exits, slopes, etc.),
  • percentage of HGVs,
  • number of HGVs,
  • traffic flow,
  • period (in some countries no ban is issued during the weekend).

4.6.2.4 Distinctiveness to other ITS services

In practice, an HGV overtaking ban is part of a larger integrated traffic management system including others service as:

  • Hard shoulders running
  • Dynamic lane management
  • Variable speed limit Dynamic
  • Dynamic incident warning

Relevant complementary information, which is not the content of this service description and will be covered by other DGs, is: 

  • Pre-trip and on-trip information services which may be used to inform on-trip or pre-trip users about the current operational status of the HGV overtaking ban (see TIS DG01-DG02).
  • Recommendations about VMS According Vienna convention
  • Information provision should be coordinated with traffic management plans (TMP, see TMS-07) operated by road authorities or traffic management centres.

4.6.3 Harmonization requirements and advice

4.6.3.1 ITS service definition

An HGV Overtaking ban service means to channel the heavy goods vehicles in a single lane (slow lane). This measure improves the traffic flow conditions by reducing vehicle queues caused by slow HGV overtaking. It also contributes to ensuring a better acceptance of heavy goods vehicles by the other road users. 

The heavy goods vehicles overtaking ban implementation is one of the traffic management measures allowing traffic managers and road operators to propose solutions for a better fluidity of their network during peak periods. This traffic control measure constitutes one of the priority services to improve the cohabitation of heavy goods vehicles and private cars on networks with high traffic levels.

4.6.3.2 Functional requirements and advice

4.6.3.2.1 Functional architecture

Figure 73: Interface architecture of the HGV Overtaking Ban service

Figure 74 shows the typical functional and information architecture of the HGV Overtaking ban service.

Figure 74: Functional architecture of the HGV Overtaking Ban service

4.6.3.2.2 Functional requirements and advice

Functional requirement:

  • FR1: it is recommended to prepare HGV Overtaking ban service implementation with an easy functional decomposition. The proposed seven sub functions may be followed when implementing the service.

Table 34: Sub-Functions of the HGV Overtaking Ban service

The devices and methodologies for traffic data collection are not covered by this guideline. They depend, among other things, on the particular data collection system used and are left to the operator to select.

Functional requirement:

  • FR2: for the dynamic service it is recommended that the data collection system should be able to detect real-time traffic data (e.g. vehicle flow, speed and HGV% per lane).

4.6.3.3 Interface requirements

  • IFR1: If the HGV Overtaking Ban service provides HGV Overtaking Ban information at interface 1 (see Figure 73), it must provide coded information including the following elements:
    • Location (section) of the HGV overtaking ban
    • If applicable the affected lanes (esp. on carriageways with more than two lanes)
    • If applicable a specification of the affected vehicles (e.g. characterised by their weight)
    • Start time, and, if applicable, the end time of the HGV overtaking ban.
  • IFR2: If interface 2 is implemented, the HGV Overtaking Ban service must provide at interface 2 (see Figure 73) HGV Overtaking Ban information coded in C-ITS messages including the following elements:
    • the respective road sign for the overtaking ban
  • IFR3: When relevant, the HGV Overtaking Ban service should collect at interface 3 (see Figure 73) C-ITS coded Probe Vehicle Data information (microscopic traffic situation) relevant to this ITS Core service.

4.6.3.4 Organisational Requirements

Depending on the traffic conditions and periods, the objectives of an HGV overtaking ban could be to:

  • Improve network fluidity,
  • Improve safety,
  • Improve user comfort.

Whatever the initial objectives, the anticipated benefits of the service rely on stakeholders’ involvement for its implementation and road users’ acceptance on the network.

Organisational Architecture

Figure 75: Organisational architecture of the HGV Overtaking Ban service

Organisational requirement:

  • OR1: the organisational and operational structure of the service, as well as the role of each organisation/body and its tasks, must be compliant with the National Access Points across Europe, within the scope of the implementation of the delegated acts adopted under Directive 2010/40/EU

Organisational advice:

  • The service implementation requires the involvement of various organisations which are in charge of the following general roles:

Road authorities

For the HGV overtaking ban the subsidiarity principle applies, i.e. Member States decide for themselves whether and how a truck overtaking ban is applied. The road authorities are responsible for the decision and the deployment of the service. They have to conduct preliminary studies:

  • Launch a detailed traffic study in order to define exactly the area where the service will be implemented,
  • Identify the level of accidents on the network (with regard to HGV involvement)
  • Identify the existing collection systems, control systems and information systems
  • Identify the existing HGV ban regulations and constraints regulation for implementing the service
  • Select the sections where the ban will be implemented
  • Validate the thresholds for the strategy activation (permanent, intermittent, dynamic)
  • Study and estimate the necessary additional equipment and systems to install
  • Plan the organisational and technical aspects of the evaluation
  • Involve partners
  • Launch communication actions
  • Establish the administrative and regulation procedures before installing such a ban on the network.

Road operators

Following decisions taken by the road authorities they are mainly responsible for:

  • conducting the relevant studies,
  • implementing the technical equipment and systems,
  • recording data for evaluation purposes,
  • informing partners when the ban is operated (especially Police) in the case of dynamic bans, ◼ informing service operators when the ban is operated.

Organisational requirement:

  • OR2: In the case where road operators have to exchange data requiring interoperability between two or more different organisations[1], they must enable their system to use DATEX II”.

Organisational advice:

Law and order forces

  • Police are mainly responsible for HGV overtaking ban enforcement. In the case of permanent or intermittent bans they can plan enforcement actions of their own.

Nevertheless, dynamic ban implementation requires specific information actions from the Road operators: the ban is only operational when thresholds for strategy activation are reached. In the case of enforcement implementation, Police patrols need to be informed by road operators in realtime in order to plan intervention. Enforcement may concern different types of control:

  • HGV overtaking ban compliance
  • Speed compliance
  • Inter-vehicle distance respect (mainly for HGV)

HGV representatives

Positive impacts of the service result from respect of the ban by HGV drivers. Such a measure requires coherent communication actions towards HGV representatives. In the case of dynamic bans, road operators manage real-time on-trip information through VMS, dedicated road traffic radio, on-board devices. It is important to stress the benefits of accident savings and the very small increase to journey times for HGVs to HGV operators and drivers.

HGV representatives have to be engaged as soon as possible in the ban process so that they can facilitate information transfer to their HGV drivers.

Media

Operators inform users of the existence of the measure(s), along with its interest and objectives, in order to increase respect for it in the future.

Service operators and on-board navigation systems

These operators need to be aware of the measure(s) to integrate them in the pre-trip or real-time services they manage. This implies that road operators make dynamic information available through a relevant interface providing, for instance, real-time DATEX II publications.

Permanent bans may be integrated as restrictions in the navigation systems. Dynamic bans must be disseminated to on-board units through real-time services using DATEX II interfaces.

Organisational requirement:

  • OR3: Along the same line as OR2 (In the case that road operators have to exchange data requiring interoperability between two or more different organisations, they must enable their system to use DATEX II). Services operators must be able to integrate the DATEX II publications provided by the road operators when they publish the ban information measure.

4.6.3.5 Common Look & Feel requirements and advice

4.6.3.5.1 Length of the ban section

Some evaluation results showed that for a better acceptance of the service, the ban should be implemented on sections from 5 to 20 km long.  Above this distance, HGV drivers tend not respect the ban. One observes that it depends on the drivers’ cultural approach, which can vary from one country to another. For instance, in Netherlands, the ban is applied on longer sections with a good level of truck drivers acceptance.

Common Look & Feel requirement:

  • CL&FR1: A wide area deployment of this service may limit the length of the ban to 20 km on a section.

The following figure summarises this recommendation:

Figure 76:  Length of ban configuration

4.6.3.5.2 Beginning of the ban VMS 

Common Look & Feel requirement:

  • CL&FR2: The dynamic HGV overtaking ban should require the use of VMS (or prism) display. The icon is the C, 13ba panel
Figur77: C, 13ba panel

In the instance that the HGV ban is implemented for specific categories of lorries (> 12 Tonnes for example), in addition to the use of the C 13ba panel (which corresponds to a ban for HGV > 3.5 t.), it is strongly recommended to clearly specify the type of vehicles concerned by the ban. 

Common Look & Feel requirement:

  • CL&FR3: In the case that the HGV ban is implemented for specific categories of lorries (> 12 Tonnes for example), the C 13ba panel must be completed with an additional panel type H,1 which will specify the tonnage of HGV concerned (without tonnage precision the ban applies for HGV > 3.5t) Example of overtaking ban for HGV > 12 tonnes:
Figure 78: HGV Ban panel for 12t

When buses, caravans or vehicles with trailers are concerned by the ban measure the additional panel type H,5 should be used. However, dedicated icons for buses, caravans or trailers need to be studied with ESG4 “Mare Nostrum”. 

Figure 79: H5 panel

4.6.3.5.3 End of the ban VMS

Common Look & Feel requirement:

  • CL&FR4: The end of the dynamic ban section must be signalled, when this end is provided with VMS.  The panel to be used is the C17 d panel:
Figure 80: C17 d panel

4.6.3.5.4 Location of the signalisation

On the motorway section

Common Look & Feel requirement:

  • CL&FR5: In order to remind drivers of the dynamic ban when driving, VMS should be installed no more than 10km apart.
Figure 81: VMS Configuration AC17 d panel

At the motorway entrance

Common Look & Feel requirements:

  • CL&FR6: For the dynamic overtaking ban, a VMS should be installed on the motorway section just after the entrance.
  • CL&FR7: Additional dynamic information using VMS may also be installed on the motorway access
Figure 82: VMS Configuration

At the exit of rest and service areas

Users stopped on rest and services areas must be informed when restarting their trip. A banactivation could occur while drivers are taking a rest and they need to be informed when leaving service areas.

Common Look & Feel requirement:

  • CL&FR8: Additional dynamic information using VMS may also be installed at the exit of the rest and service areas.
Figure 83: VMS Configuration C

4.6.3.6 ICT Infrastructure requirements

Static overtaking ban deployment does not require specific ITS infrastructure. Deployment of dynamic systems can make use of ICT infrastructures developed for other ITS services.  For this dynamic service the required infrastructures are: 

Data collection

Technical advice:

  • Traffic counting stations: Traffic counting stations constitute the essential data collection entry for the functioning of this traffic management measure. Precision and quality of measures are essential for the ability to react as well as for the response time of the HGV overtaking ban, which has been determined according to flow level or HGV percentage.

Technical requirements:

  • TR1: the data collection system may be able to detect in real-time the following parameters: vehicle flow, speed and HGV%.
  • TR2: Relevant data input may be provided by local detection points on all lanes and/ or by floating car data.
  • TR3: After the ban area a station to collect journey time information for the evaluation purposes may be implemented.

Technical advice:

  • Video surveillance: Video surveillance helps traffic managers to assess the measure on vehicles interdistance (implementation of chevron road markings can be used to improve vehicle spacing) and potential difficulties related to the exit of personal vehicles.
    • An autonomous analysis system recommended when all equipment systems are dedicated to the measure or in transitory phase for experimentation.
    • An integrated solution which is generally better because it offers the possibility to interact with other traffic management measures and equipment. 
  • Information: It is quite important to widely inform users of the activation of the measure. Two main objectives for the information:
    • Acquaint the users with the existence of the measure, with its interest and objectives in order to ensure compliance
    • Inform users in real-time through VMS, dedicated road traffic radio, on-board devices, …

Regarding the timing and area, the following table presents the different potential information means.

Table 35: Possible information means

4.6.3.7 Common Look & Feel requirements and advice

Variable message signs requirements:

  • CL&FR9: The display of signs/pictograms on VMS or other end-user devices should be in accordance with prevailing national road codes and:
    • Member States which ratified the Vienna Convention MUST respect the Vienna Convention and the European agreement supplementing the convention (1st May 1971) and SHOULD consider the Consolidated Resolution on Road Signs and Signals (R.E.2).
    • Member States which did not ratify the Vienna Convention SHOULD follow the Vienna Convention and also consider the R.E.2.

Variable message signs advice:

  • It is recommended that the equipment installed for this service is compatible with the Traffic Control Centre. This compatibility will ensure the interoperability of systems and will allow the possibility to use the dedicated HGV overtaking ban’s equipment for another types of traffic management actions if needed.

4.6.3.8 Required standards and specifications

Information provision standards:

  • IPS1: If a HGV Overtaking Ban service is implemented at interface 1, the information (see IFR1) must be profiled based on EN 161573:2019 using the DATEX II Recommended Service Profile for HGV overtaking ban.
  • IPS2: If interface 2 is implemented, HGV Overtaking Ban information (see IFR2) must be profiled using an IVIM based on ISO 19321 using the C-ROADS C-ITS Message Profiles for the In-Vehicle Signage service, specifically the Traffic Sign Use Case.
  • IPS3: When relevant, the Probe Vehicle Data (microscopic traffic situation) information (see IFR3) should be collected, which is profiled based on ETSI EN 302 637-2 using the CAR2CAR Communication Consortium Basic System Profile.

4.6.3.9 Level of Service Definition

4.6.3.9.1 Level of Service Criteria

Table 36 gives the Level of Service recommendations for a HGV Overtaking Ban service. The background of this concept is descripted in chapter 2.6.

Table 36: Level of Service recommendations for HGV Overtaking Ban

4.6.3.9.2 Level of Service Criteria related to Operating Environment

Level of Service requirement:

  • LoSR1: The Level of Service to Operating Environment mapping table does not imply any obligation to deploy ITS services. However, if services are deployed, they should comply with the table. Given that pre-deployment surveys / evaluations provide the necessary evidence to proceed with the deployment, the minimum and optimum LoS should respect the Level of Service to Operating Environment mapping table.

Table 37: Level of Service to Operating Environment mapping table (see also chapter 2.5.3 and ANNEX C)


[1] In the TTIS context, ‘organisations’ mean Traffic and Traveller Data providers and Service providers.